Post

Clear thinking: the reading that actually moves the needle

The small set of sources I keep returning to for making better decisions: Farnam Street, Munger, decision journals, and the habit of inversion.

Clear thinking: the reading that actually moves the needle

Most “think better” content is repackaged common sense. The sources below are the ones that survived contact with actual decisions — each changed something concrete about how I work.

Start here

  • Farnam Street — Shane Parrish’s blog is the best single starting point on clear thinking, full stop. Begin with the core mental models post, then wander. The writing is dense with ideas and light on filler, and the archive rewards slow reading. The FS newsletter (Brain Food) is one of the few I keep after years of pruning.
  • Clear Thinking by Shane Parrish — the book distills the blog’s decade of material into one pass: recognizing when a moment is a decision, defaults that hijack you (emotion, ego, social pressure, inertia), and building safeguards instead of relying on willpower in the moment.

The deep cuts

  • Poor Charlie’s Almanack — Charlie Munger’s collected talks. “The Psychology of Human Misjudgment” alone is worth the book: twenty-five cognitive tendencies, each with real consequences attached. Stripe Press’s edition is free to read online.
  • Superforecasting by Philip Tetlock — what measurably good judgment looks like: small updates, explicit probabilities, keeping score. The single most transferable habit: write the forecast down before the outcome arrives.
  • Thinking in Bets by Annie Duke — separates decision quality from outcome quality. “Resulting” — judging a decision by how it happened to turn out — is the most common analysis error in engineering postmortems, and this book names it.

Habits that make the reading stick

  • Keep a decision journal. FS has a template. For any decision that matters: the situation, what you expect to happen and with what probability, how you feel. Review quarterly. It is humbling and it works — memory rewrites itself; the journal doesn’t.
  • Invert, always invert. Before optimizing for success, list what would guarantee failure and avoid it. Cheaper than brilliance and more reliable.
  • Write to find out what you think. Paul Graham’s Putting Ideas into Words makes the case in four pages: a half-formed idea feels complete until you try to write it down.

One warning: collecting frameworks is its own procrastination. Pick one habit — the journal is the highest-leverage — and run it for a quarter before adding anything else.

This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.